Skip to main content
The University of Chicago

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • UCLR Online
  • Symposium
  • About Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Becoming a Member
    • The Maroonbook
  • Submissions to the Law Review
    • Submissions to the Law Review Online

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact

Displaying 371 - 380 of 1304

Access to Justice

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/uclr-online/briefly-podcast/access-justice
Huge numbers of civil cases feature at least one party who lacks legal representation. Host Adam Hassanein and Professor Anna Carpenter (Utah Law) discuss the ins and outs of the access-to-justice problem—and solutions sounding in law, policy, and human decency.

Post-Election Litigation and the Paradox of Voting

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/post-election-litigation-and-paradox-voting
Economists will tell you that your vote does not matter. Or at least it does not matter if what you care about is who wins a large election.

The Corpus and the Courts

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/corpus-and-courts
Ten years ago, Stephen C. Mouritsen published a student note outlining the possibility of a new legal interpretation tool: corpus linguistics.

Narrowing the Remedial Gap: Damages for Disability Discrimination in Outsourced Federal Programs

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/narrowing-remedial-gap-damages-disability-discrimination-outsourced-federal-programs

The Corpus and the Critics

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/corpus-and-critics
A decade ago we proposed the use of the tools of corpus linguistics in the interpretation of legal language.

Competing Algorithms for Law: Sentencing, Admissions, and Employment

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/competing-algorithms-law-sentencing-admissions-and-employment
When the past is thought to predict the future, it is unsurprising that machine learning, with access to large data sets, wins prediction contests when competing against an individual, including a judge. Just as computers predict next week’s weather better than any human working alone, at least one study shows that machine learning can make better decisions than can judges when deciding whether or not to grant bail.

The Missing Indian Affairs Clause

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/missing-indian-affairs-clause
Billy Jo Lara, a Turtle Mountain Native American, struck a federal officer on the Spirit Lake Reservation.

Classaction.gov

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/classactiongov
Class actions, brought on an opt-out basis under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) and state analogues, are highly controversial.

Volume 88.2 (March 2021) 275–530

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/volume-882-march-2021-275-530
Articles The Corpus and the Critics

The Shadow Docket

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/uclr-online/briefly-podcast/shadow-docket
What on earth is the Supreme Court’s “shadow docket”? Steve Vladeck (U. Texas Law) and Kate Shaw (Cardozo Law) join host Deb Malamud to explain the Court’s unusual—and controversial—way of resolving some of our nation’s most pressing legal controversies.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 37
  • Current page 38
  • Page 39
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

University of Chicago Law School
The University of Chicago
Law Review

1111 E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637

Accessibility
Business Law Review
Chicago Journal of International Law
Legal Forum
UC law Linkedin
UC law Twitter
UC law Youtube

© 2025 University of Chicago Law School