Print Archive
A deaf man is admitted to the hospital for emergency surgery. The hospital, unable to locate an available American Sign Language interpreter, relies on the man’s children to communicate with him.
Today, it is an almost universally accepted proposition that the patent system makes too many mistakes.
During the confirmation hearings for then-Judge John Roberts, Senator Richard Durbin asked about economic equality.
In 2012, Amazon agreed to invest $130 million in building two fulfillment centers and to create 1,500 jobs in New Jersey in exchange for the state relieving Amazon of its sales-tax-collection obligations.
A long time ago—roughly between the 2014–2015 academic year and the spring of 2016, when Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy monopolized the public conversational agenda—there was a heated debate about whether our culture was experiencing a reprise of the 1990s and its struggles over “political correctness.”
At the end of the October 2014 term, the Supreme Court decided a seemingly mundane case involving municipal sign ordinances.
Magistrate judges are “nothing less than indispensable” to the modern judicial system.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A. Inc v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc has created a cottage industry in choreography.
Can the US Constitution, as currently written, handle the problem of excessive partisanship? Or, instead, does the Constitution need to be amended to address this problem?