This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we’re discussing an article by Samuel Moyn, Professor at Yale Law School, called "Law Schools Are Bad for Democracy" and a response to that article by Yuval Levin, editor of National Affairs. We spoke to Professor Moyn and Mr. Levin about their views on this issue.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
Music from bensound.com.
This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we’re discussing the Chicago School of Antitrust and whether it should be reassessed in the modern, digital economy. We spoke to Timothy Muris, Professor at the Antonin Scalia Law School and former Chairman of the FTC, Jonathan Nuechterlein, partner at Sidley Austin and former General Counsel of the FTC, and Maurice Stucke, Professor at the University of Tennessee College of Law.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
Music from bensound.com.
This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we're discussing law enforcement's use of genealogy databases to solve cold cases and related Fourth Amendment implications. We spoke to Natalie Ram, Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore Law School, and Jason Kreag, Associate Professor at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, to help us make sense of this issue.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
Music from bensound.com.
This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we're discussing the global trend of democratic backsliding with Professor Aziz Huq and Professor Tom Ginsburg of the University of Chicago Law School. Professors Ginsburg and Huq have recently written the book, "How to Save a Constitutional Democracy," on that subject.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
Music from bensound.com.
This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today, we're discussing the Roberts Court with Adam Liptak, Supreme Court correspondent for the New York Times, and Lee Epstein, professor of political science and law at Washington University in St. Louis.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
Music from bensound.com.
This is Briefly, a production of the University of Chicago Law Review. Today we’re discussing some legal concerns related to the collection and use, or misuse, of personal data. Today’s podcast features interviews with Professor Lior Strahilevitz and Professor Omri Ben-Shahar, from the University of Chicago Law School.
Check us out on Twitter at uchilrev, and our website at https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/
This episode was produced by Yosef Schaffel. Music from bensound.com
Our subject today is bureaucratic resistance. Bureaucratic resistance occurs when civil servants disobey the orders of elected officials and political appointees. Some kind of bureaucratic shirking is inevitable in modern government, but bureaucratic resistance has been uniquely public during the first two years of the Trump administration.
Today we're joined today by Jennifer Nou, Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and Chris Walker, a Professor of Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law.
Today on Briefly we’re discussing the increasingly important intersection of the #MeToo movement and corporate law. What do corporations do in response to sexual assault allegations? Do corporate actions downplay the victim's struggle, or do they play an important role in shaping society when politics doesn't work?
Traditional nuisance ordinances are environmental regulations that prohibit things like piling trash in a yard or making loud noises at night. But some ordinances prohibit frequent 911 calls and allow the city to fine the property owner when 911 is called too many times to a certain property. These laws have dire consequences for victims of domestic violence, and they can lead to these victims becoming homeless.
Today on Briefly we explore the controversial doctrine of "qualified immunity," a constitutional law doctrine that prevents executive officials like police from being brought into court for alleged constitutional violations, including acts of violence. Where does the immunity come from? Why does it exist? Is it to protect government officers from their deeds? Or is it to allow courts to expand civil rights without creating numerous court cases?
