The Availability of Discovery Sanctions for Violations of Protective Orders
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Availability of Discovery Sanctions for Violations of Protective Orders on Facebook
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Availability of Discovery Sanctions for Violations of Protective Orders on Twitter
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Availability of Discovery Sanctions for Violations of Protective Orders on Email
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Availability of Discovery Sanctions for Violations of Protective Orders on LinkedIn
He thanks Malcolm Yeary, Maggie Wells, Savannah Kostrzewa, and the University of Chicago Law Review Online team.
The Florida defendant files a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1)—asserting that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Should the court grant it? More specifically, does having an anonymous John Doe as a defendant categorically preclude diversity jurisdiction?
She thanks Michael T. Brody for his expertise and insight, as well as Matthew Makowski, Renic Sloan, Virginia Robinson, and the University of Chicago Law Review Online team.
In April of 2022, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, handed down the latest decision in its “packaged tuna antitrust saga,” with implications that have the potential to usher in a sea change to class action practice.
She thanks Matthew Makowski, Abigail Barney, Annie Kors, and the University of Chicago Law Review Online team. She also thanks the health reporters at the Philadelphia Inquirer for inspiring this piece.
After Ricardo Saldana suffered a stroke in 2014, his family moved him into Elms Convalescent Hospital, a skilled nursing facility in Glendale, California, so he could receive the care he needed.