Skip to main content
The University of Chicago

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • UCLR Online
  • Symposium
  • About Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Becoming a Member
    • The Maroonbook
  • Submissions to the Law Review
    • Submissions to the Law Review Online

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
2
Essay
87 Special

Substitutes, Complements, and Irritants: Garza v Lappin and the Role of International Law in US Courts

Tom Ginsburg
Leo Spitz Professor of International Law, Ludwig and Hilde Wolf Research Scholar, The University of Chicago Law School; Professor of Political Science, The University of Chicago.

Thanks to Humberto Romero, Shih-An Wang, and Alex Wong for research assistance.

Share
  • Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Substitutes, Complements, and Irritants: Garza v Lappin and the Role of International Law in US Courts on Facebook
  • Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Substitutes, Complements, and Irritants: Garza v Lappin and the Role of International Law in US Courts on Twitter
  • Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Substitutes, Complements, and Irritants: Garza v Lappin and the Role of International Law in US Courts on Email
  • Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Substitutes, Complements, and Irritants: Garza v Lappin and the Role of International Law in US Courts on LinkedIn
PDF
TABLE OF CONTENTS
    Related Posts
    Home
    The University of Chicago Law Review

    University of Chicago Law School
    The University of Chicago
    Law Review

    1111 E. 60th Street
    Chicago, IL 60637

    Accessibility
    Business Law Review
    Chicago Journal of International Law
    Legal Forum
    UC law Linkedin
    UC law Twitter
    UC law Youtube

    © 2025 University of Chicago Law School