2
Comment
81.4
“Integral” Decisionmaking: Judicial Interpretation of Predispute Arbitration Agreements Naming the National Arbitration Forum
Daniel A. Sito
BA 2009, Swarthmore College; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School
Share
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Integral” Decisionmaking: Judicial Interpretation of Predispute Arbitration Agreements Naming the National Arbitration Forum on Facebook
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Integral” Decisionmaking: Judicial Interpretation of Predispute Arbitration Agreements Naming the National Arbitration Forum on Twitter
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Integral” Decisionmaking: Judicial Interpretation of Predispute Arbitration Agreements Naming the National Arbitration Forum on Email
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Integral” Decisionmaking: Judicial Interpretation of Predispute Arbitration Agreements Naming the National Arbitration Forum on LinkedIn
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tom Ginsburg
Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School
Thanks to Jack Barceló, Omri Ben-Shahar, Christopher Drahozal, Lee Fennell, Philip J. Loree, Jr, Paul Bennett Marrow, Judge Richard Mosk, and Stephen Ware for helpful comments. Thanks also to Joseph Parish for helpful research assistance.
David S. Yoo
BA 2002, Georgia State University; MA 2004, Columbia University; JD Candidate 2008, The University of Chicago
Richard A. Nagareda
Professor and Director, Cecil D. Branstetter Litigation & Dispute Resolution Program, Vanderbilt University Law School
Brian Fitzpatrick, Samuel Issacharoff, Daniel Rodriguez, Kevin Stack, and participants in faculty workshops at the University of Arizona and Vanderbilt provided helpful comments on earlier drafts. Kelly Walsh provided valuable research assistance.