Comment

Understanding Equal Sovereignty

Abigail B. Molitor

BA 2012, University of Iowa; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School

Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Understanding Equal Sovereignty on Facebook
Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Understanding Equal Sovereignty on Twitter
Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Understanding Equal Sovereignty on Email
Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Understanding Equal Sovereignty on LinkedIn

PDF

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Federalism Jurisdiction Legal History State Law

Online

Essay

Distributing the Corporation’s Brain: Principal Place of Business Without Physical Presence

Nicholas Hallock

Nicholas Hallock is a staff member of The University of Chicago Law Review and a J.D. candidate in the University of Chicago Law School class of 2022. He received his B.A. from Columbia University in 2017.

Thanks to the editors of The University of Chicago Law Review for their help with this piece.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many businesses transitioned to remote work for some or all of their employees, relying on videoconference platforms like Zoom and Microsoft Teams for communication.

Distributed Corporations Federal Courts Jurisdiction Principal Place of Business

Online

Essay

Before Bakke: The Hidden History of the Diversity Rationale

Anthony S. Chen

Anthony S. Chen is Associate Professor of Sociology and Political Science at Northwestern University, where he is also a Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research. The author of The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1972 (Princeton, 2009), he is interested in political sociology, historical sociology, and American political development, with a special emphasis on civil rights, social and economic policy, and business-government relations.

Lisa M. Stulberg

Lisa M. Stulberg is Associate Professor of Sociology of Education at New York University’s Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development. The author of Race, Schools, and Hope: African Americans and School Choice after Brown (Teachers College Press, 2008) and the co-editor (with Sharon Lawner Weinberg) of Diversity in American Higher Education: Toward a More Comprehensive Approach (Routledge, 2011), she researches the politics of race and education, and LGBTQ+ social change.

Chen and Stulberg are completing a book on the history and development of race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions.

For all of the legal and political contention surrounding affirmative action, one facet of the discussion is characterized by a curious, if implicit, consensus that spans all manner of ideological and partisan divisions.

Diversity Legal History

Online

Essay

John Marshall’s Proslavery Jurisprudence: Racism, Property, and the “Great” Chief Justice

Paul Finkelman

President and Professor of History, Gratz College. B.A., Syracuse, 1971; M.A. and Ph.D., The University of Chicago, 1972, 1976. Fellow in Law and Humanities, Harvard Law School, 1982–83. President William McKinley Emeritus Professor of Law, Albany Law School.

I thank Candace Jackson Gray for her help in researching census and tax records connected to Chief Justice Marshall’s slaveholding, and Charles F. Hobson, Tim Huebner, Alysa Landry, and R. Kent Newmyer for their many comments on early versions of this piece. I thank Harvard University Press for allowing me to reprint material in this essay that comes from my book, Supreme Injustice: Slavery in the Nation’s Highest Court (Harvard 2018).

This is the second Essay in a two-part series exploring Chief Justice John Marshall’s private and public relationship to slavery.

John Marshall Legal History Slavery