2
Comment
81.4
“Widespread” Uncertainty: The Exclusionary Rule in Civil-Removal Proceedings
Michael J. O’Brien
BA 2012, University of Notre Dame; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School
Share
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Widespread” Uncertainty: The Exclusionary Rule in Civil-Removal Proceedings on Facebook
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Widespread” Uncertainty: The Exclusionary Rule in Civil-Removal Proceedings on Twitter
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Widespread” Uncertainty: The Exclusionary Rule in Civil-Removal Proceedings on Email
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | “Widespread” Uncertainty: The Exclusionary Rule in Civil-Removal Proceedings on LinkedIn
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Allison Hugi
BA 2013, Yale University; JD Candidate 2018, The University of Chicago Law School
Imagine you go to Toronto for a weekend trip with your family. While driving home to Detroit, a border agent pulls you aside, brings you into an isolated room, and asks you, seemingly out of nowhere, “How many times a day do you pray?”
Christopher Slobogin
Stephen C. O’Connell Professor of Law, University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law
The author would like to thank participants in workshops at Stanford Law School and Florida Law School for their feedback on the content of this article, and Victoria Ianni for her research assistance. This paper is a version of a talk given at The University of Chicago Law School’s Surveillance Symposium, June 15–16, 2007.
Jake Linford
BA 1996, University of Utah; JD Candidate 2008, The University of Chicago