Skip to main content
The University of Chicago

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • UCLR Online
  • Symposium
  • About Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Becoming a Member
    • The Maroonbook
  • Submissions to the Law Review
    • Submissions to the Law Review Online

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact

Displaying 411 - 420 of 1304

Virtual Criminal Courts

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/virtual-criminal-courts
Criminal courtrooms are among many workplaces to shut down and adopt virtual operations in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

COVID-19 and the Ruralization of U.S. Criminal Court Systems

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/covid-19-and-ruralization-us-criminal-court-systems
The COVID-19 pandemic is imposing typically rural practice constraints on the United States’ urban and suburban criminal court systems.

Policing the Pandemic

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/policing-pandemic
Although there were those who foretold the risks of a pandemic, it is fair to say most of the world was caught unprepared. All of the sudden there was a scramble—for protective clothing, for tests, for antivirals and a vaccine.

Policing Opioid Use Disorder in a Pandemic

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/policing-opioid-use-disorder-pandemic
We are not very good at admitting past mistakes, especially on issues of race, and that has consequences.

Law, Psychology & False Confessions

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/uclr-online/briefly-podcast/law-psychology-false-confessions
Why do people confess to crimes they didn't commit? Host Taiyee Chien and guest Professor Richard A. Leo (U. San Francisco Law) explore the difficult and persistent psychological phenomenon of false confessions—and how the law can address it going forward.

“What Shall I Give My Children?”: Installment Land Contracts, Homeownership, and the Unexamined Costs of the American Dream

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/what-shall-i-give-my-children-installment-land-contracts-homeownership-and-unexamined
A white picket fence. A house in the suburbs. 2.5 kids. There may be nothing more central to the modern conception of the American Dream than homeownership.

A (Very) Unlikely Hero: How United States v Armstrong Can Save Retaliatory Arrest Claims After Nieves v Bartlett

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/very-unlikely-hero-how-united-states-v-armstrong-can-save-retaliatory-arrest-claims
In May 2019, the Supreme Court attempted to clarify the long-disputed standard for First Amendment retaliatory arrest claims. Nieves v Bartlett holds that, as a threshold matter, a plaintiff must prove a lack of probable cause for their arrest, but that a “narrow qualification”—an exception to the probable cause burden—“is warranted for circumstances where officers have probable cause to make arrests, but typically exercise their discretion not to do so.”

Necessary “Procedures”: Making Sense of the Medicare Act’s Notice-and-Comment Requirement

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/necessary-procedures-making-sense-medicare-acts-notice-and-comment-requirement
Perhaps no problem has caused more consternation and outright confusion in administrative law circles than the Ad-ministrative Procedure Act’s (APA) exemptions to notice-and-comment rulemaking, the process by which agencies present proposed rules to the public for feedback before issuing them in final form.

Exporting American Discovery

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/exporting-american-discovery
Across the country, federal courts now routinely have a hand in the resolution of foreign civil disputes. They do so by compelling discovery in the United States—typically as much discovery as would be available for a lawsuit adjudicated in federal district court—and making it available for use in foreign civil proceedings governed by different procedural rules.

The Myth of Creditor Sabotage

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/myth-creditor-sabotage
A basic assumption in the standard paradigm of corporate finance is that a company’s investors want the company to succeed. To be sure, investors of different classes—stockholders and bondholders, for example—bear risk and reward unequally.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 41
  • Current page 42
  • Page 43
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

University of Chicago Law School
The University of Chicago
Law Review

1111 E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637

Accessibility
Business Law Review
Chicago Journal of International Law
Legal Forum
UC law Linkedin
UC law Twitter
UC law Youtube

© 2025 University of Chicago Law School