The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights on Facebook
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights on Twitter
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights on Email
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights on LinkedIn
The author thanks the University of Chicago Law Review Online team for their helpful feedback.
How often do Supreme Court opinions include what might be called “lobbying language,” which endorses a policy position while calling for another government entity to realize it? Reviewing relevant cases, this Essay finds that the sample set includes at least a dozen examples of lobbying language. As it turns out, lobbying is not so unusual for the Supreme Court.
He thanks Cheridan Christnacht, Matthew Makowski, Claire Rice, Virginia Robinson, and the University of Chicago Law Review Online team.
If you are a crime victim in Ohio, you have the rights “to be treated with fairness and respect,” to “a prompt conclusion” of your case, and “to be heard in any public proceeding . . . in which a right of the victim is implicated.”
The authors thank Jacob Charles, Charanya Krishnaswami, and Alex Platt for insightful comments and suggestions.
On November 19, 2021, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of homicide charges stemming from his killing of two people—Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum—at a protest of police violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse had armed himself and traveled to the protest, purportedly to defend Kenoshans’ property against looting.