Skip to main content
The University of Chicago

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • UCLR Online
  • Symposium
  • About Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Becoming a Member
    • The Maroonbook
  • Submissions to the Law Review
    • Submissions to the Law Review Online

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact

Displaying 431 - 440 of 1304

Affirmative Action, Transparency, and the SFFA v. Harvard Case

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/affirmative-action-transparency-and-sffa-v-harvard-case
Affirmative action in college admissions for underrepresented minorities provokes strong emotions. These strong emotions are guided by two competing principles.

Affirmative Algorithms: The Legal Grounds for Fairness as Awareness

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/affirmative-algorithms-legal-grounds-fairness-awareness
Acentral concern with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is bias.

Presidential Power & Its Limits

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/uclr-online/briefly-podcast/presidential-power-its-limits
President Obama used his "pen & phone" to transform the immigration laws. President Trump declared an emergency to fund his border wall. Presidential power seems ascendant—or is it?

The Hertz Maneuver (and the Limits of Bankruptcy Law)

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/hertz-maneuver-and-limits-bankruptcy-law
On June 11, 2020, the Hertz Corporation introduced a new strategy for bankruptcy financing.

Exhaustion of Local Remedies and the FSIA Takings Exception: The Case for Deferring to the Executive’s Recommendation

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/exhaustion-local-remedies-and-fsia-takings-exception-case-deferring-executives
By 1976, Congress recognized that foreign states and their business enterprises were common participants in the global economy, often transacting with US citizens. It further recognized that there were no uniform or comprehensive rules governing when and how private parties could bring suit against those foreign governments in the courts of the United States.

Simplifying Patent Venue

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/simplifying-patent-venue
From the 1990s to 2017, life was good for plaintiffs in patent infringement lawsuits. In 1990, the Federal Circuit1 interpreted the patent venue statute—28 USC § 1400(b)—to allow patent venue in any district with personal jurisdiction over a corporate defendant.

Litigating the Line Drawers: Why Courts Should Apply Anderson-Burdick to Redistricting Commissions

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/litigating-line-drawers-why-courts-should-apply-anderson-burdick-redistricting
In the battle against partisan gerrymandering, redistricting commissions are now on the front lines.

California’s Proposition 47 and Effectuating State Laws in Federal Sentencing

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/californias-proposition-47-and-effectuating-state-laws-federal-sentencing
Vickie Sanders was convicted in a California state court of felony drug possession, sixteen years before California voters would pass Proposition 47. Proposition 47, which was passed in 2014, reduces most possessory drug offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, and allows California courts to retroactively redesignate individuals’ felonies as misdemeanors.

Frankfurter, Abstention Doctrine, and the Development of Modern Federalism: A History and Three Futures

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/frankfurter-abstention-doctrine-and-development-modern-federalism-history-and-three
The Supreme Court did not use the term “federalism” in any opinions in its first 150 years. The Court had (of course) previously talked about federal-state relations, but it did so without the term “federalism”—it preferred a different vocabulary, discussing the police powers of the states and the enumerated powers of the federal government.

This Land Is Not Our Land

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/print-archive/land-not-our-land
In asserting that “this land is our land” in his new book by that title,1 Professor Jedediah Purdy hopes to craft a narrative of possibility and common plight that can serve as a banner high and wide enough for all to unite beneath. The task he undertakes in this meditative collection of essays, written in a colloquial and often poetic tone, is no less than to sketch out a “horizon to aim for”—for all to aim for—a vision of the future to guide the kind of legal, social, and political change he wishes to see.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 43
  • Current page 44
  • Page 45
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

University of Chicago Law School
The University of Chicago
Law Review

1111 E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637

Accessibility
Business Law Review
Chicago Journal of International Law
Legal Forum
UC law Linkedin
UC law Twitter
UC law Youtube

© 2025 University of Chicago Law School