Skip to main content
The University of Chicago

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • UCLR Online
  • Symposium
  • About Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Becoming a Member
    • The Maroonbook
  • Submissions to the Law Review
    • Submissions to the Law Review Online

Utility Menu

  • uchicago law
  • Order
  • Contact

Displaying 511 - 520 of 1304

Go Configure

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/go-configure
In Slices and Lumps: Division and Aggregation in Law and Life, I argue that the future depends on configuration. Putting together resources and cooperation in the right combinations is essential to human flourishing in multiple domains: the environment, the city, the workplace, the market, and the home.

The Smooth Value of Lumpy Goods

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/smooth-value-lumpy-goods
Economists often employ a convenient set of assumptions regarding the goods that individuals care about and the form of individuals’ preferences for these goods.

Slicing Defamation by Contract

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/slicing-defamation-contract
Slices and Lumps is a recipe book for thinking. Using a deceptively simple analytical framework, the book showcases the power of conceptualizing the world through the prism of “slices” and “lumps.”

Indivisibilities in Technology Regulation

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/indivisibilities-technology-regulation
Lee Fennell’s Slices and Lumps: Division and Aggregation in Law and Life reveals the benefits of isolating configurations in legal analysis. A key characteristic of configurations, or “lumps” whether found or created, is that they are indivisible.

Getting People to Lump or Split Themselves: Pooling vs Separation

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/getting-people-lump-or-split-themselves-pooling-vs-separation
My goal in this short Essay is to show how an analytic vocabulary first developed to analyze insurance markets by Michael Rothschild and Joseph Stiglitz (some parallel ideas were developed by Michael Spence at roughly the same time) can shed light on a range of institutional design questions, from crime to contract damages.

Paying with Lumps

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/paying-lumps
Slices and Lumps, the remarkable new book by Professor Lee Fennell, begins from the title itself to tell a story about the instability of how the world is organized. Lumps can be natural things, formed in a bowl by humidity’s kiss, but slices are often the work of human intervention.

Lumpy Work

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/lumpy-work
For close to ten years, the gig economy has dazzled with its seeming powers of disaggregation.

Water Slices and Water Lumps

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/water-slices-and-water-lumps
While reading Lee Fennell’s book Slices and Lumps, I was struck that the book could have been written using only examples from water law. Fennell’s framework describes nearly all challenges and aims inherent in water management, and connects these challenges to broader questions in life and law.

Ownership Work and Work Ownership

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/ownership-work-and-work-ownership
Professor Lee Fennell’s groundbreaking Slices and Lumps incisively reconceptualizes how the gig—or “slicing”—economy impacts the structuring of work. But it goes even further to alert us to how “delumping the working experience” (p 6) can transform the infrastructure of work, from an individual’s task design to the agglomeration costs and benefits of untying and retying workers to desks, work to benefits, and worksites to surrounding communities.

Lumps in Antitrust Law

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/lumps-antitrust-law
The importance of aggregation and division in modern antitrust policy cannot be overstated. Illegal acts of collusion are defined by the agreement of separate competitors to join together in acting as though they were a single firm in a collusive scheme.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 51
  • Current page 52
  • Page 53
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »
Home
The University of Chicago Law Review

University of Chicago Law School
The University of Chicago
Law Review

1111 E. 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637

Accessibility
Business Law Review
Chicago Journal of International Law
Legal Forum
UC law Linkedin
UC law Twitter
UC law Youtube

© 2025 University of Chicago Law School