UCLR Online

I recall vividly a flight that I took about ten years ago.  As my wife and I boarded the plane, the pilot greeted us at the threshold—a nice touch.  I couldn’t help but notice his necktie, and maybe that was the point.  It was emblazoned with “Second Amendme

Professors Adam Chilton and Mila Versteeg’s How Constitutional Rights Matter is simply a game changer.

Chilton and Versteeg tell an interesting story. I use the word “story” deliberately, to locate the genre of the work in narrative—in their terms, qualitative—analysis, rather than in the scientistic genre.

The Supreme Court’s changing composition and, relatedly, its increasing skepticism for the current structure and pervasiveness of the administrative state have given rise to increased constitutional challenges to agency actions that seem increasingly likely to be successful.

Economists will tell you that your vote does not matter. Or at least it does not matter if what you care about is who wins a large election.

Ten years ago, Stephen C. Mouritsen published a student note outlining the possibility of a new legal interpretation tool: corpus linguistics.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many businesses transitioned to remote work for some or all of their employees, relying on videoconference platforms like Zoom and Microsoft Teams for communication.

The Supreme Court “has never invalidated a [ ] chosen procedure for carrying out a sentence of death as the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.”

Data privacy has been at the forefront of recent foreign-policy conversations.

Bodum USA, Inc. v. La Cafetiere, Inc. is a case about French press, trade dress, and a twenty-year-old contract.

When I began my clerkship year with Judge Diane Wood, I was keenly aware that I would be getting to know one of the most powerful people I would ever encounter in my life.