Citizens All Along: Derivative Citizenship, Unlawful Entry, and the Former Immigration and Nationality Act
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Citizens All Along: Derivative Citizenship, Unlawful Entry, and the Former Immigration and Nationality Act on Facebook
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Citizens All Along: Derivative Citizenship, Unlawful Entry, and the Former Immigration and Nationality Act on Twitter
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Citizens All Along: Derivative Citizenship, Unlawful Entry, and the Former Immigration and Nationality Act on Email
- Share The University of Chicago Law Review | Citizens All Along: Derivative Citizenship, Unlawful Entry, and the Former Immigration and Nationality Act on LinkedIn
The author thanks the University of Chicago Law Review Online team for their helpful feedback.
How often do Supreme Court opinions include what might be called “lobbying language,” which endorses a policy position while calling for another government entity to realize it? Reviewing relevant cases, this Essay finds that the sample set includes at least a dozen examples of lobbying language. As it turns out, lobbying is not so unusual for the Supreme Court.
Imagine you go to Toronto for a weekend trip with your family. While driving home to Detroit, a border agent pulls you aside, brings you into an isolated room, and asks you, seemingly out of nowhere, “How many times a day do you pray?”
The author thanks Stephanie Bair, Jim Brau, Emily Bremer, Brigham Daniels, Daniel Hemel, David Moore, Carolina Núñez, Jarrod Shobe, Paul Stancil, Lisa Grow Sun, Christopher Walker, the participants in the 2017 Center for the Study of the Administrative State’s Research Roundtable on Rethinking Due Process and accompanying public policy conference held at the Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, and the participants in the 2016 Rocky Mountain Junior Scholars Forum held at the S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah. Michael A. Stevens provided helpful research assistance. Financial support was provided by Brigham Young University and the Center for the Study of the Administrative State.
Modern administrative law is often said to present a dilemma.