Print
Article
85.1
Sticky Regulations
Aaron L. Nielson
Associate Professor, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University

The author thanks Stephanie Bair, Jim Brau, Emily Bremer, Brigham Daniels, Daniel Hemel, David Moore, Carolina Núñez, Jarrod Shobe, Paul Stancil, Lisa Grow Sun, Christopher Walker, the participants in the 2017 Center for the Study of the Administrative State’s Research Roundtable on Rethinking Due Process and accompanying public policy conference held at the Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, and the participants in the 2016 Rocky Mountain Junior Scholars Forum held at the S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah. Michael A. Stevens provided helpful research assistance. Financial support was provided by Brigham Young University and the Center for the Study of the Administrative State.

Modern administrative law is often said to present a dilemma.

Print
Article
85.1
Institutional Loyalties in Constitutional Law
David Fontana
Associate Professor of Law, George Washington University

Our thanks to Michael Abramowicz, Joseph Blocher, Mary Anne Case, Justin Driver, Alison LaCroix, Jonathan Masur, Jon Michaels, Douglas NeJaime, Martha Nussbaum, David Pozen, David Schleicher, Paul Schied, Naomi Schoenbaum, Micah Schwartzman, Michael Selmi, Ganesh Sitaraman, Lior Strahilevitz, and Laura Weinrib for thoughtful comments and suggestions. Lael Weinberger, Brent Cooper, and other editors at the Review also supplied useful critical thoughts. We also received helpful feedback from workshops at the George Washington Law School and the University of Chicago Law School. Support for one of us (Huq) was supplied by the Frank J. Cicero, Jr. Fund. Our errors are our responsibility alone.

Aziz Z. Huq
Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School

The Constitution’s separation of powers implies the existence of three distinct and separate branches.

Print
Article
76.4
Happiness and Punishment
John Bronsteen
Associate Professor, Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Christopher Buccafusco
Assistant Professor, Chicago-Kent College of Law
Jonathan S. Masur
Assistant Professor, The University of Chicago Law School

We thank Stephanos Bibas, Frederic Bloom, Josh Bowers, Sharon Dolovitch, Brandon Garrett, Bernard Harcourt, Dan Kahan, Adam Kolber, Brian Leiter, Richard McAdams, Eric Posner, Adam Samaha, Stephanie Stern, Lior Strahilevitz, David Strauss, and Jeannie Suk for helpful comments, and Kathleen Rubenstein for excellent research assistance.

Print
Article
84 Special
The Forthrightness of Justice Scalia
Ryan J. Walsh
Chief Deputy Solicitor General, State of Wisconsin. The views expressed here are the author’s alone.

Justice Scalia was a frank man. Not only that, he was transparent.

Print
Article
84 Special
The Education of a Law Clerk, with Thanks to Justice Scalia
Andrew J. Nussbaum
The author graduated from The University of Chicago Law School in 1991, after which he clerked for then-Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the DC Circuit, and then for Justice Scalia (October Term 1992), and is now a partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York.

One afternoon in the late spring of 1991, the home stretch of my law school career, the phone in The University of Chicago Law Review offices rang.

Print
Article
84 Special
Coots, Loons, and Civility
Taylor A.R. Meehan
Ms. Meehan is an attorney at Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP in Chicago. She graduated from The University of Chicago Law School in 2013 and served as one of Justice Scalia’s law clerks during his last term on the Court.

Justice Scalia visited the Law School in February 2012. He taught my constitutional law class—by “taught,” he said a few words about the Seventeenth Amendment and then fielded questions lobbed from the class about anything but the Seventeenth Amendment.

Print
Article
84 Special
Justice Scalia: Constitutional Conservative
Noel J. Francisco
47th Solicitor General of the United States and law clerk to Justice Scalia during the Supreme Court’s 1997 to 1998 Term. The views expressed here are the author’s alone.

When former President Ronald Reagan died in 2004, an outpouring of praise followed from across the political spectrum.

Print
Article
84 Special
Some Reflections on Justice Scalia
Lillian R. BeVier
David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor Emerita, University of Virginia Law School.

I knew Justice Scalia for many years and considered him a generous friend. We were both great supporters of the Federalist Society and met frequently at Society events, but our longest and most interesting conversations usually happened when I called him to recommend students for clerkships, which I did quite often.

Print
Essay
84 Special
Originalist Law Reform, Judicial Departmentalism, and Justice Scalia
Kevin C. Walsh
Professor of Law, University of Richmond School of Law.

I thank my Richmond colleagues Jud Campbell, Hank Chambers, Paul Crane, Jessica Erickson, Bill Fisher, and Jack Preis for helping me think through the arguments and ideas in this Essay as they gestated over time.

Judicial departmentalism is the view that the Constitution means in the judicial department what the Supreme Court says it means in deciding a case.

Print
Essay
84 Special
Remembering the Boss
Jonathan F. Mitchell
Visiting Professor of Law, Stanford Law School.

Thanks to Will Baude, Vince Buccola, Richard Epstein, Ashley Keller, Adam Mortara, Nick Rosenkranz, James Sullivan, and David Strauss for comments.

Justice Scalia never liked tributes or accolades.