Print Archive
The act of terrorism and the state of democracy are related in complex, dimly understood ways.
The rule of law and the rule of God appear to be on a collision course.
Professors Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Huq, and Mila Versteeg (GHV) have written a mile-a-minute, and decidedly one-sided, account of the decline and fall of liberal constitutionalism throughout the world in the past generation.
Equality is guaranteed in every liberal-democratic constitution around the world, but inequality of wealth and income is widespread and on the rise.
The European Union was founded in the 1950s as an experiment in postwar regional integration, in part to help rebuild national economies damaged by World War II through economic integration, and in part to ward off, by means of closer legal and political integration of states, the threat of totalitarianism and Soviet expansion.
President Donald Trump’s ascendance to the White House has been understood as signaling a breakdown in American global leadership.
In the wake of World War II, liberal constitutionalism emerged as a default design choice for political systems across Europe and North America. It then diffused more widely across the globe as a whole.
Imagine you go to Toronto for a weekend trip with your family. While driving home to Detroit, a border agent pulls you aside, brings you into an isolated room, and asks you, seemingly out of nowhere, “How many times a day do you pray?”
The default rule for judicial review of agency action is that review is available under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) for agency actions that are both ripe and final.
Modern administrative law is often said to present a dilemma.
The Constitution’s separation of powers implies the existence of three distinct and separate branches.