Affirmative Action at a Crossroads

Online
Essay
Before Bakke: The Hidden History of the Diversity Rationale
Anthony S. Chen
Anthony S. Chen is Associate Professor of Sociology and Political Science at Northwestern University, where he is also a Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research. The author of The Fifth Freedom: Jobs, Politics, and Civil Rights in the United States, 1941–1972 (Princeton, 2009), he is interested in political sociology, historical sociology, and American political development, with a special emphasis on civil rights, social and economic policy, and business-government relations.
Lisa M. Stulberg
Lisa M. Stulberg is Associate Professor of Sociology of Education at New York University’s Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development. The author of Race, Schools, and Hope: African Americans and School Choice after Brown (Teachers College Press, 2008) and the co-editor (with Sharon Lawner Weinberg) of Diversity in American Higher Education: Toward a More Comprehensive Approach (Routledge, 2011), she researches the politics of race and education, and LGBTQ+ social change.

Chen and Stulberg are completing a book on the history and development of race-conscious affirmative action in college admissions.

For all of the legal and political contention surrounding affirmative action, one facet of the discussion is characterized by a curious, if implicit, consensus that spans all manner of ideological and partisan divisions.

Online
Essay
Affirmative Action, Transparency, and the SFFA v. Harvard Case
Peter S. Arcidiacono
Peter Arcidiacono is a Professor of Economics at Duke University, a Research Associate of the NBER, an IZA Research Fellow, and a fellow of the Econometric Society.
Josh Kinsler
Josh Kinsler is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Georgia.
Tyler Ransom
Tyler Ransom is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Oklahoma and an IZA Research Affiliate.

The views expressed and conclusions reached in this Essay are those of the authors; they do not purport to reflect the views of SFFA. To the extent this Essay relies on records from SFFA v. Harvard, it relies solely on the public records from the case.

Affirmative action in college admissions for underrepresented minorities provokes strong emotions. These strong emotions are guided by two competing principles.