77.4

2
Article
77.4
On Law’s Tiebreakers
Adam M. Samaha
Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School

Thanks to Matt Adler, Douglas Baird, Omri Ben-Shahar, Lee Fennell, Barry Friedman, Jake Gersen, Aziz Huq, Dan Kahan, Saul Levmore, Anup Malani, Tom Miles, Richard McAdams, Rick Pildes, Eric Posner, Jennifer Rothman, and David Strauss for helpful conversations and comments on an earlier draft, and to workshop participants at Loyola Law School Los Angeles, The University of Chicago Law School, and New York University Law School’s Constitutional Theory Colloquium. The latter workshop had to be cut short, and dramatically so, but Rick Pildes and David Golove made sure that I benefited from the participants’ generous attention to the Article. Hanna Chung and Daniel Roberts provided excellent research assistance. Mistakes are mine.

Institutional Design Judicial Decision-Making Public Choice
2
Response
77.4
Realism, Punishment, and Reform
Paul H. Robinson
Colin S. Diver Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Owen D. Jones
New York Alumni Chancellor’s Chair in Law and Professor of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University; Director, MacArthur Foundation Law and Neuroscience Project
Robert Kurzban
Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
Criminal Law Empirical Analysis Institutional Design
2
Article
77.4
Some Realism about Punishment Naturalism
Donald Braman
Associate Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School
Dan M. Kahan
Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Law, Yale Law School
David A. Hoffman
Associate Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law

We thank Kenworthy Bilz, Bernard Harcourt, Owen Jones, Sarah Lawsky, Richard McAdams, Janice Nadler, Kitty Richards, Stephanie Stern, and Lior Strahilevitz for their comments and advice.

Criminal Law Empirical Analysis Institutional Design

Volumes