v88.6

Print
Comment
v88.6
The Legal Causes of Labor Market Power in the U.S. Agriculture Sector
Candice Yandam Riviere
J.D. Candidate, The University of Chicago Law School; Ph.D. Candidate in economics, Pantheon-Sorbonne University.

Many thanks to Professor Joshua Macey and Professor Eric A. Posner for their guidance and feedback. Thanks to my fellow Law Review editors for their meticulous comments and rigorous edits.

Llacua is one of many shepherds who move to the United States for a few months each year with an H-2A visa to work on a ranch. The H-2A program allows U.S. employers to petition to hire foreign temporary agricultural workers, provided that the employers satisfy specific regulatory requirements.

Print
Comment
v88.6
The Scope of Evidentiary Review in Constitutional Challenges to Agency Action
Conley K. Hurst
B.A. 2017, Washington and Lee University; M.St. 2018, University of Oxford; J.D. Candidate 2022, The University of Chicago Law School.

Many thanks to Professors Ryan Doerfler and Jennifer Nou for their helpful feedback during the drafting process.

Presidents have increasingly turned to the administrative state to implement their political agendas.

Print
Comment
v88.6
In Search of Ordinary Meaning: What Can Be Learned from the Textualist Opinions of Bostock v. Clayton County?
Sam Capparelli
B.S. 2018, The George Washington University; J.D. Candidate 2022, The University of Chicago Law School.

Many thanks to Professor Brian Leiter, Samuel Kane, Crofton Kelly, Tony Leyh, Jennifer Chang, Tony Alessi, Kelly Gregg, George Colligan, and all of the editors of the University of Chicago Law Review for their comments and advice.

What is the meaning of the phrase “discriminate because of sex”? This was the key question the Supreme Court faced in Bostock v. Clayton County.

Print
Article
v88.6
Federal Corporate Law and the Business of Banking
Lev Menand
Lecturer in Law and Academic Fellow, Columbia Law School.

We thank Dan Awrey, Lucian Bebchuk, Ryan Bubb, Jeff Gordon, David Grewal, Bob Hockett, Howell Jackson, Rob Jackson, Lina Khan, Joshua Macey, Gillian Metzger, Saule Omarova, Ganesh Sitaraman, Joe Sommer, Mike Townsley, Art Wilmarth, and the participants in the 22nd Annual Law & Business Conference at Vanderbilt Law School, the Wharton Financial Regulation Workshop, the Columbia Law School Blue Sky Workshop, and the 11th Labex ReFi-NYU-SAFE/LawFin Law & Banking/Finance Conference for their helpful comments and insights.

Morgan Ricks
Professor of Law and Enterprise Scholar, Vanderbilt University Law School.

It is a bedrock (though still controversial) principle of U.S. business law that corporate formation and governance are the province of state, not federal, law.

Print
Article
v88.6
Asymmetric Subsidies and the Bail Crisis
John F. Duffy
Samuel H. McCoy II Professor of Law and Paul G. Mahoney Research Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law.
Richard M. Hynes
John Allan Love Professor of Law and Nicholas E. Chimicles Research Professor of Business Law and Regulation, University of Virginia School of Law.

We thank Josh Bowers, Kellen Funk, Sandra Mayson, John Monahan, Megan Stevenson, Stephen Ware and workshop participants at the University of Virginia and at the Scalia Law School of George Mason University for valuable comments. We thank Christian Fitzgerald, Ariel Hayes, Caitlyn Koch, Molly Mueller, and Louis Tiemann for valuable research assistance. We also thank Paul Prestia for responding to our inquiry on a factual matter. All errors remain our own.

The last several years have seen “a truly astounding” and “unprecedented” outpouring of scholarship and commentary decrying the large number of individuals held in pretrial detention, measuring the negative social consequences of such detention, and debating what to do about it.

Volumes