Personalized law is on-trend.
Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People
He thanks Omri Ben-Shahar, Ariel Porat, and the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics for inviting him to make this contribution. He thanks as well the participants in the Personalized Law Conference, the participants in the Junior Scholars Colloquium, and the Canonical Ideas seminar for their helpful feedback on earlier drafts, and gives special thanks to Ryan Sakoda for extremely helpful conversations on the ideas contained within this Essay. Lastly, he thanks the University of Chicago Law Review editorial team for their excellent editorial work. Nothing herein represents the views of the Supreme Court of New Jersey or the New Jersey Judiciary.
Negligence law seldom accounts for a person’s idiosyncrasies.
Javier thanks Omri Ben-Shahar for his endless mentorship, Niki Sabetfakhri for her tireless support, and the participants of the University of Chicago Law School’s 2021 Symposium on Personalized Law for their insightful comments and discussions during our time in Hyde Park.
Should people be allowed to vote before the age of eighteen?
Volumes
- Volume 91.4June2024
- Volume 91.3May2024
- Volume 91.2March2024
- Volume 91.1January2024
- Volume 90.8December2023
- Volume 90.7November2023
- Volume 90.6October2023
- Volume 90.5September2023
- Volume 90.4June2023
- Volume 90.3May2023
- Volume 90.2March2023
- Volume 90.1January2023
- Volume 89.8December2022
- Volume 89.7November2022
- Volume 89.6October2022
- Volume 89.5September2022
- Volume 89.4June2022
- Volume 89.3May2022
- Volume 89.2March2022
- Volume 89.1January2022
- 84 SpecialNovember2017
- Online 83Presidential Politics and the 113th Justice
- Online 82Grassroots Innovation & Regulatory Adaptation
- 83.4Fall 2016
- 83.3Summer 2016
- 83.2Spring 2016
- 83.1Winter 2016
- 82.4Fall 2015
- 82.3Summer 2015
- 82.2Spring 2015
- 82.1Winter 2015
- 81.4Fall 2014
- 81.3Summer 2014
- 81.2Spring 2014
- 81.1Winter 2014