Immigration Law

Online
Essay
Trump 2.0 Removal Cases & the New Shadow Docket
William N. Eskridge Jr.
William N. Eskridge Jr. is the Alexander M. Bickel Professor of Public Law, Yale Law School. He appreciates extraordinarily helpful comments from Susan Koniak, Sydney Allard, Jackson Dellinger, Albert Feuer, and Navid Kiassat, as well as excellent editorial assistance from the University of Chicago Online team.

Welcome to the Supreme Court’s emergency docket. Like the Twilight Zone, the emergency docket is “the middle ground between light and shadow,” and hence is the core of the so-called “shadow docket.” Commentators have criticized the Court’s shadow-docket interventions: Summary orders shirk the Court’s responsibility to resolve important legal issues in reasoned opinions informed by complete briefing and oral argument, are unwise because they risk premature decisionmaking before issues percolate in the lower courts, provide insufficient or confusing direction for lower courts, and undermine the Court’s legitimacy because of their “shadowy” deliberation. My big problem is that shadow-docket stays deeply (not just technically) undermine the rule of law and violently affect the lives of people like O.C.G. without sufficient legal justification.

Online
Essay
A Brief History of Schedule A: The United States’ Forgotten Shortage Occupation List
Lindsay Milliken
Lindsay Milliken is a research assistant of science, technology, and innovation policy at the Federation of American Scientists. She supports the Congressional Science Policy Initiative and the Technology and Innovation Initiative.

She thanks Doug Rand for his thoughtful advice and guidance during the research and drafting of this paper.

High-skilled labor shortages threaten the United States’ ability to compete internationally with both adversaries and allies in major industries, such as manufacturing and high technology.