Empirical Analysis

2
Response
77.4
Realism, Punishment, and Reform
Paul H. Robinson
Colin S. Diver Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Owen D. Jones
New York Alumni Chancellor’s Chair in Law and Professor of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University; Director, MacArthur Foundation Law and Neuroscience Project
Robert Kurzban
Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
2
Article
77.4
Some Realism about Punishment Naturalism
Donald Braman
Associate Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School
Dan M. Kahan
Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Law, Yale Law School
David A. Hoffman
Associate Professor of Law, Temple University Beasley School of Law

We thank Kenworthy Bilz, Bernard Harcourt, Owen Jones, Sarah Lawsky, Richard McAdams, Janice Nadler, Kitty Richards, Stephanie Stern, and Lior Strahilevitz for their comments and advice.

2
Essay
79.1
Religion, Schools, and Judicial Decision Making: An Empirical Perspective
Michael Heise
Professor, Cornell Law School
Gregory C. Sisk
Laghi Distinguished Chair in Law, University of St. Thomas School of Law

We thank Dawn M. Chutkow as well as participants in the Understanding Education in the United States Symposium at the University of Chicago Law School for comments on an earlier draft. Professor Sisk offers thanks to his assistant, Bethany Fletcher, for recording data coding and to law students Eric Beecher and Alicia Long for assistance with opinion coding. A spreadsheet containing our data set, regression run results, coding of each decision, coding of each judge, and code books may be found at http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/gcsisk /religion.study.data/cover.html.