Constitutional Law

Print
Article
85.1
Institutional Loyalties in Constitutional Law
David Fontana
Associate Professor of Law, George Washington University

Our thanks to Michael Abramowicz, Joseph Blocher, Mary Anne Case, Justin Driver, Alison LaCroix, Jonathan Masur, Jon Michaels, Douglas NeJaime, Martha Nussbaum, David Pozen, David Schleicher, Paul Schied, Naomi Schoenbaum, Micah Schwartzman, Michael Selmi, Ganesh Sitaraman, Lior Strahilevitz, and Laura Weinrib for thoughtful comments and suggestions. Lael Weinberger, Brent Cooper, and other editors at the Review also supplied useful critical thoughts. We also received helpful feedback from workshops at the George Washington Law School and the University of Chicago Law School. Support for one of us (Huq) was supplied by the Frank J. Cicero, Jr. Fund. Our errors are our responsibility alone.

Aziz Z. Huq
Frank and Bernice J. Greenberg Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School

The Constitution’s separation of powers implies the existence of three distinct and separate branches.

Constitutional Law Institutional Design Separation of Powers
2
Article
75.4
The Dale Problem: Property and Speech under the Regulatory State
Louis Michael Seidman
Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law, Georgetown University Law Center

Many people helped me think through the problems addressed in this article. I am especially grateful to Larry Alexander, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, Julie Cohen, Lee Anne Fennell, Martin Lederman, Gary Peller, Adam Samaha, Geoffrey Stone, Mark Tushnet, and Rebecca Tushnet, and to participants at workshops at The University of Chicago Law School, Georgetown University Law Center, and Loyola University Law School. I received excellent research assistance from James Banda and Richard Harris.

Constitutional Law First Amendment Freedom of Speech Property Law
2
Article
76.2
The Modernizing Mission of Judicial Review
David A. Strauss
Gerald Ratner Distinguished Service Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School

I am grateful to participants in workshops at the Harvard, University of Virginia, University of Michigan, and University of Chicago Law Schools, and to Mary Anne Case, Barry Cushman, Elizabeth Emens, Richard Fallon, Barry Friedman, Don Herzog, Christine Jolls, Michael Klarman, Jacob Levy, Eric Posner, Richard Primus, Adam Samaha, Kirsten Smolensky, Geoffrey Stone, Cass Sunstein, John Sylla, and Adrian Vermeule for comments on earlier versions of this Article. I also thank Mark Sherman and Karen Courtheoux for excellent research assistance and the Sonnenschein Faculty Fund at The University of Chicago Law School for financial support.

Constitutional Law Judicial Decision-Making Statutory Interpretation
2
Article
76.4
Regulating Privatized Government through § 1983
Richard Frankel
Associate Professor of Law, Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University

I would like to thank Steven Goldblatt, Jane Aiken, Amanda Leiter, Kathryn Sabbeth, Erin Aslan, Eliza Platts-Mills, Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Rebecca Lee, and Marcy Karin for their assistance back when this Article was just an idea. I also would like to thank Dan Filler, Alex Geisinger, David Cohen, Lawrence Rosenthal, Jack Beermann, Daryl Levinson, Margo Schlanger, David Achtenberg, and Alan Chen for their thoughtful and detailed feedback. Additionally, I would like to thank the faculties at the University of Denver Strum College of Law, Quinnipiac University School of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University for their helpful ideas and suggestions.

Constitutional Law Institutional Design § 1983
Book review
77.2
The Classical Liberal Alternative to Progressive and Conservative Constitutionalism
Richard A. Epstein
James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law, The University of Chicago Law School; Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution; Visiting Professor of Law, New York University School of Law

My thanks to Sharon Yecies, The University of Chicago Law School, Class of 2011, for her excellent research assistance on an earlier version of this Review.

Constitutional Law Political Philosophy

Volumes