2 Comment 79.4 Taming the Hydra: Prosecutorial Discretion under the Acceptance of Responsibility Provision of the US Sentencing Guidelines Alexa Chu Clinton BA 2008, Stanford University; JD Candidate 2013, The University of Chicago Law School Criminal Defense Criminal Law Law Enforcement/Policing Sentencing
2 Comment 79.4 A Common Law Approach to D&O Insurance “In Fact” Exclusion Disputes Joshua Phares Ackerman BA 2007, The University of Chicago; JD Candidate 2013, The University of Chicago Law School Business Organizations Contract Law Insurance
Print Comment 80.1 Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretations First Advanced in Litigation? The Chevron Two-Step and the Skidmore Shuffle Bradley George Hubbard BS 2010, University of Missouri; MAcc 2010, University of Missouri; JD Candidate 2013, The University of Chicago Law School Administrative Law Chevron Statutory Interpretation
Print Comment 81.3 A Dispute over Bona Fide Disputes in Involuntary Bankruptcy Proceedings Steven J. Winkelman BA 2009, University of St. Thomas; MA 2011, University of WisconsinMilwaukee; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Bankruptcy Federalism Res Judicata State Law
Print Comment 81.3 Let’s Be Reasonable: Controlling Self-Help Discovery in False Claims Act Suits Stephen M. Payne BA 2012, University of Notre Dame; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Business Organizations False Claims Act Privilege and Confidentiality
Print Comment 81.3 Maybe Once, Maybe Twice: Using the Rule of Lenity to Determine Whether 18 USC § 924(c) Defines One Crime or Two F. Italia Patti BA 2008, The University of Chicago; JD Candidate 2014, The University of Chicago Law School Criminal Defense Criminal Law Sentencing Statutory Interpretation
Print Comment 81.3 Comcast Corp v Behrend and Chaos on the Ground Alex Parkinson BA 2011, Harvard University; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Class Actions FRCP Remedies
Print Comment 81.3 The Perceived Intrusiveness of Searching Electronic Devices at the Border: An Empirical Study Matthew B. Kugler BA 2005, Williams College; PhD 2010, Princeton University; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Empirical Analysis Fourth Amendment Freedom from Unreasonable Search and Seizure Technology Telecommunications
Print Comment 81.3 FISA’s Fuzzy Line between Domestic and International Terrorism Nick Harper BA 2009, University of Notre Dame; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Fourth Amendment Freedom from Unreasonable Search and Seizure National Security
Print Comment 81.3 Standing on Ceremony: Can Lead Plaintiffs Claim Injury from Securities That They Did Not Purchase? Corey K. Brady BA 2010, Florida State University; JD Candidate 2015, The University of Chicago Law School Class Actions Financial Regulation Securities Law Standing
