Regulation
Thanks to Ty Alper, Michelle Wilde Anderson, Robert Bartlett, Holly Doremus, Dan Farber, Prasad Krishnamurthy, Brian Leiter, Katerina Linos, Prasad Krishnamurthy, Anup Malani, Emily Hammond Meazell, Martha Nussbaum, Dave Owen, Eric Posner, Bertrall Ross, Adam Samaha, Joseph Sax, Eleanor Swift, David Takacs, David Weisbach, David Winickoff, and Katrina Wyman, and participants at workshops at UC Berkeley School of Law, the University of Chicago Law School, the University of Maine School of Law, the Law and Society Association 2011 Annual Meeting, and the Colloquium on Environmental Scholarship at Vermont Law School for helpful comments. Thanks to Santosh Sagar, Jill Jaffe, Jennifer Aengst, Zachary Markarian, and Jessica Cheng for research assistance.
My thanks to Peter Horn and Benjamin Margo, NYU Law School Class of 2014 for their excellent research decision on an earlier draft of this Response.
For helpful comments, I am grateful to Jennifer Gordon, Catherine Fisk, David Moore, and Laura Weinrib. This essay benefitted from presentations at UC Irvine School of Law, BYU J. Reuben Clark Law School, and at The University of Chicago’s Immigration Law and Institutional Design Symposium, held at The University of Chicago Law School on June 15 and 16, 2012. The UC Irvine Law School research librarians provided excellent support. I am also grateful to Morgan White-Smith, Taylor Meehan, and the other University of Chicago Law Review editors for their superb editorial work. Please direct comments and questions to slee@law.uci.edu.
We are grateful to Ron Levin, John Manning, Arden Rowell, David Strauss, participants at a Harvard Law School faculty workshop, and participants at a University of Chicago symposium for valuable comments, and to Evelyn Blacklock and Maile Yeats-Rowe for superb research assistance. Parts of this Essay significantly expand and revise, while drawing on, a section of a near-contemporaneous, and much longer, article, Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, The New Coke: On the Plural Aims of Administrative Law, 2015 S Ct Rev 41. We are grateful for permission to draw on that section here.
I. Cases and Problems
Volumes
- Volume 92.1January2025
- Volume 91.8December2024
- Volume 91.7November2024
- Volume 91.6October2024
- Volume 91.5September2024
- Volume 91.4June2024
- Volume 91.3May2024
- Volume 91.2March2024
- Volume 91.1January2024
- Volume 90.8December2023
- Volume 90.7November2023
- Volume 90.6October2023
- Volume 90.5September2023
- Volume 90.4June2023
- Volume 90.3May2023
- Volume 90.2March2023
- Volume 90.1January2023
- Volume 89.8December2022
- Volume 89.7November2022
- Volume 89.6October2022
- Volume 89.5September2022
- Volume 89.4June2022
- Volume 89.3May2022
- Volume 89.2March2022
- Volume 89.1January2022
- Volume 88.8December2021
- v88.6October2021
- v88.4June2021
- v88.3May2021
- 87.1January2020
- 84.4Fall2017
- 84.3Summer2017
- 84.2Spring2017
- 84.1Winter2017
- 84 SpecialNovember2017
- 81.3Summer2014
- 80.1Winter2013
- 78.1Winter2011